<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Singular &#8220;They&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 02:56:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen Wingate</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen Wingate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-120</guid>
		<description>I agree with Susan and Sonia.  When in doubt, rewrite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Susan and Sonia.  When in doubt, rewrite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Rubart</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Rubart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-77</guid>
		<description>Liking your thoughts, but I&#039;m having a bit of trouble keeping up with your massive volume of posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liking your thoughts, but I&#8217;m having a bit of trouble keeping up with your massive volume of posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine H</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Oh, and &quot;there&#039;s&quot; is so prevalent now that I hear celebrities and TV commentators use it all the time.  I have even seen it in print in advertising for major companies.

Same with who/whom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and &#8220;there&#8217;s&#8221; is so prevalent now that I hear celebrities and TV commentators use it all the time.  I have even seen it in print in advertising for major companies.</p>
<p>Same with who/whom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine H</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-75</guid>
		<description>I tend to use &quot;his or her&quot; when writing, but &quot;they&quot; when speaking.

I find this much less troublesome than the common misuse of who/whom, or using &quot;There&#039;s&quot; in reference to plural items.

&quot;There&#039;s some cups on the table&quot; just sends me into fits... and I even catch myself doing it!  So I am constantly correcting myself and it goes like this...&quot;There&#039;s - there are - some cups on the table.&quot;

My fear is that my young son will think that &quot;There&#039;s there are&quot; is the correct way to denote plural objects!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to use &#8220;his or her&#8221; when writing, but &#8220;they&#8221; when speaking.</p>
<p>I find this much less troublesome than the common misuse of who/whom, or using &#8220;There&#8217;s&#8221; in reference to plural items.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s some cups on the table&#8221; just sends me into fits&#8230; and I even catch myself doing it!  So I am constantly correcting myself and it goes like this&#8230;&#8221;There&#8217;s &#8211; there are &#8211; some cups on the table.&#8221;</p>
<p>My fear is that my young son will think that &#8220;There&#8217;s there are&#8221; is the correct way to denote plural objects!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosslyn</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosslyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-74</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going to be a conscientious objector on this one. Though I have succumbed to using the singular &quot;they&quot; sometimes in spoken communication, I don&#039;t like it. Not one bit. Language is a system, like math. I like the beauty and order of the system.

Can&#039;t we all just switch to &quot;hir?&quot; :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to be a conscientious objector on this one. Though I have succumbed to using the singular &#8220;they&#8221; sometimes in spoken communication, I don&#8217;t like it. Not one bit. Language is a system, like math. I like the beauty and order of the system.</p>
<p>Can&#8217;t we all just switch to &#8220;hir?&#8221; <img src='http://www.stevelaube.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Heine</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Heine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 09:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-73</guid>
		<description>I like this post. I prefer clarity and flow over grammatical correctness myself. (Though obviously I prefer to achieve all three!).

In the first example, using &#039;his&#039; puts the husband in my mind. A mild confusion, I admit, but potential confusion nonetheless. Whereas using &#039;their&#039; produces no confusion. It communicates what is meant without resorting to the awkward &#039;he or she&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like this post. I prefer clarity and flow over grammatical correctness myself. (Though obviously I prefer to achieve all three!).</p>
<p>In the first example, using &#8216;his&#8217; puts the husband in my mind. A mild confusion, I admit, but potential confusion nonetheless. Whereas using &#8216;their&#8217; produces no confusion. It communicates what is meant without resorting to the awkward &#8216;he or she&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela Townsend</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela Townsend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-72</guid>
		<description>I considered the singular “they” a serious grammatical error until I worked as a reporter for a local newspaper.  The editor himself used “they” and “their” instead of “his or her.”  I still can’t bring myself to use a plural pronoun to modify a singular subject.  Written or spoken, the sentence just sounds wrong.  I have on occasion used the archaic “he” when “his/her” is too awkward or distracting.  Thanks for the discussion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I considered the singular “they” a serious grammatical error until I worked as a reporter for a local newspaper.  The editor himself used “they” and “their” instead of “his or her.”  I still can’t bring myself to use a plural pronoun to modify a singular subject.  Written or spoken, the sentence just sounds wrong.  I have on occasion used the archaic “he” when “his/her” is too awkward or distracting.  Thanks for the discussion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Q</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Q</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Next to be accepted is &quot;over&quot; instead of &quot;more than&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next to be accepted is &#8220;over&#8221; instead of &#8220;more than&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonja Hutchinson</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonja Hutchinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-70</guid>
		<description>It&#039;d probably be easiest to re-write the sentence so you don&#039;t have to worry about getting the pronoun wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;d probably be easiest to re-write the sentence so you don&#8217;t have to worry about getting the pronoun wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-69</guid>
		<description>How about using &quot;the partner&#039;s&quot;, &quot;the person&#039;s&quot; or simply &quot;the&quot; in the blank. It avoids all the problems.

Using &quot;the&quot; is perhaps the best since the reaction will be assumed to refer to the partner anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about using &#8220;the partner&#8217;s&#8221;, &#8220;the person&#8217;s&#8221; or simply &#8220;the&#8221; in the blank. It avoids all the problems.</p>
<p>Using &#8220;the&#8221; is perhaps the best since the reaction will be assumed to refer to the partner anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenore Buth</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Lenore Buth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 18:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Steve, for digging into this. I&#039;m working on another nonfiction book for moms. So often I write &quot;they,&quot; then change it to &quot;his or her,&quot; then to &quot;s/he.&quot; All the while I wonder which one will brand me as an unschooled hack. I agree, the &quot;singular they&quot; seems to be here to stay--and eliminates all that angst. Yet when I&#039;m writing, my ear hears the traditionalother terms. Somehow it&#039;s comforting to know that Shakespeare, etc., emmployed that terminology way back when.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Steve, for digging into this. I&#8217;m working on another nonfiction book for moms. So often I write &#8220;they,&#8221; then change it to &#8220;his or her,&#8221; then to &#8220;s/he.&#8221; All the while I wonder which one will brand me as an unschooled hack. I agree, the &#8220;singular they&#8221; seems to be here to stay&#8211;and eliminates all that angst. Yet when I&#8217;m writing, my ear hears the traditionalother terms. Somehow it&#8217;s comforting to know that Shakespeare, etc., emmployed that terminology way back when.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan at StonyRiver</title>
		<link>http://www.stevelaube.com/the-singular-they/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan at StonyRiver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 16:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://new.stevelaube.com/?p=239#comment-67</guid>
		<description>Interesting about the history of the &#039;singular they&#039;, and its use by Shakespeare and Austen. I really enjoyed this article but must admit I still find this usage jarring for some reason, and never use it. And, whatever happened to &quot;one&#039;s&quot;? 

So I would have answered your quotes with &quot;When a spouse greets a partner with derision because of an opinion, what should the reaction be?&quot; and &quot;Everyone in the building attended the party and had a wonderful time.&quot; Avoidance. lol

Thanks again -- I&#039;m looking forward to a few conversations over this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting about the history of the &#8216;singular they&#8217;, and its use by Shakespeare and Austen. I really enjoyed this article but must admit I still find this usage jarring for some reason, and never use it. And, whatever happened to &#8220;one&#8217;s&#8221;? </p>
<p>So I would have answered your quotes with &#8220;When a spouse greets a partner with derision because of an opinion, what should the reaction be?&#8221; and &#8220;Everyone in the building attended the party and had a wonderful time.&#8221; Avoidance. lol</p>
<p>Thanks again &#8212; I&#8217;m looking forward to a few conversations over this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->